Intraclause and Intersentence Conjunctions in Indonesian: A Descriptive Study

Authors

  • Gede Adistana Wira Saputra Politeknik Negeri Bali
  • I Gusti Putu Sutarma Politeknik Negeri Bali
  • Ni Putu Ni Putu Desy Damayanthi Politeknik Negeri Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58737/jpled.v6i3.1765

Keywords:

Conjunctions, Intraclause Conjunctions, Intersentence Conjunctions, Syntax, Academic Writing, Descriptive Study

Abstract

This study examines the use of intraclause and intersentence conjunctions in Indonesian through a descriptive qualitative approach. The study aims to identify the forms, functions, and errors in the use of conjunctions found in academic writing, particularly in thesis documents. Data were collected through documentation, reading, and note-taking techniques, and were analyzed through stages of identification, classification, interpretation, and conclusion drawing based on Indonesian grammatical rules. The findings reveal that conjunctions in Indonesian are generally divided into intraclause conjunctions, including coordinative, correlative, and subordinative conjunctions, as well as intersentence conjunctions. Various errors were identified, such as inappropriate conjunction functions, incorrect placement of conjunctions, excessive use of conjunctions, and illogical relationships between clauses. The most frequent errors involved the conjunctions maka, sehingga, adapun, karena, and the correlative pair tidak hanya … tetapi juga …. In addition, errors in the use of intersentence conjunctions weakened cohesion and coherence within paragraphs. The study also found several factors causing these errors, including limited understanding of conjunction functions, the influence of spoken language habits, lack of attention to sentence parallelism and coherence, the tendency to construct long and complex sentences, and insufficient language editing. Therefore, understanding the syntactic rules and proper use of conjunctions is essential in improving the quality of academic writing so that sentences become more effective, logical, cohesive, and easier to understand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alisjahbana, Sutan Takdir. 1982. Tata Bahasa Baru Bahasa Indonesia. Jilid II. Djakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Alwi, Hasan dkk. 2003. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Alwi, Hasan dkk. 2014. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa.

Alwi, Hasan dkk. 2017. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Chaer, Abdul. 1993. Gramatika Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, Abdul. 2015. Sintaksis Bahasa Indonesia: Pendekatan Proses. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Halliday, M.A.K. dan Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1979. Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Limited.

Keraf, Gorys. 2004. Komposisi. Ende-Flores: Nusa Indah.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 1986. Kelas Kata dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2008. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mees, C.A. 1954. Tatabahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Groningen, J.B. Wolters.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugono, Dendy. 2014. Mahir Berbahasa Indonesia dengan Benar. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2009. Pengajaran Wacana. Bandung: Angkasa.

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Gede Adistana Wira Saputra, I Gusti Putu Sutarma, & Ni Putu Ni Putu Desy Damayanthi. (2026). Intraclause and Intersentence Conjunctions in Indonesian: A Descriptive Study. Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development , 6(3). https://doi.org/10.58737/jpled.v6i3.1765

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.